Jump to content
  • entries
    945
  • comments
    4,956
  • views
    1,221,378

Summer Full 'o Movies pt. 7 - The Dark Knight


Nathan Strum

1,625 views

I hated the Tim Burton "Batman" film. Michael Keaton was a chinless, scrawny twerp and Jack Nicholson was a puffy, over-the-hill buffoon. The series actually got worse after that, with each film further devolving into camp versions of the original comic books, making the 60's TV series look like serious drama.

 

When Batman Begins came out a couple of years ago, it seemed to be a very promising reboot of the franchise. It took things much more seriously, had far better casting and directing, and brought more humanity to Bruce Wayne, which in turn made Batman more interesting. The only thing I really didn't like about it was the design of Gotham City, which reverted too much to the over-stylized look of the earlier films, and always seemed more like a movie set or miniature than a real city. But the rest of the film was excellent, and I was really interested to see what they would do with The Joker in the sequel.

 

For months, there has been tremendous buzz about Heath Ledger's performance as The Joker. As the movie opened the other week, that only increased, and the reviews (and box office earnings) were stellar. I hoped that at least some of The Dark Knight would live up to its expectations. It's a rare film that lives up to that much hype.

 

I needn't have worried - The Dark Knight far exceeded my expectations. In fact, it did so to the point where as I was watching the film, I completely forgot what any of my expectations actually were. The film is good on so many levels, it's hard to know where to start. But I'll start with Heath Ledger.

 

The Joker has finally been brought to life as the unhinged, unpredictable, insane, murderous maniac that he has been in the comics (when they're at their best). Ledger's performance is riveting, disturbing, funny, terrifying, and poignant - all at the same time. The sheer unpredictability of the character is what makes him so dangerous. He's brutal, manipulative, brilliant, insane and completely without regard for life. He seems to be after nothing more than, as Alfred says, "watching the world burn". He is the ultimate Batman villain, and may be the ultimate villain, period. Heath Ledger's death was tragic, and something as minor in the grand scheme of things as a movie role can't be compared to the loss of a life, but I think it's safe to say that The Joker, at least in this series of Batman films, died with him. Nobody is going to be able to recapture his performance, and we can only wonder what another film with him as The Joker would have been like. But on the positive side, we'll always have this film, and what an amazing film it is. It is the quintessential Joker vs. Batman story, and it's hard to imagine a better one.

 

The amazing thing about The Dark Knight is that Ledger's performance isn't the only great one in the film. Aaron Eckhart as Harvey Dent was eye-opening. I'd never thought much of his character (my only experiences with him being very limited) but he's really what the plot is about. As much as The Joker is the center of evil in the film, Harvey is the center of good and a force for the changes happening in Gotham. What happens with him over the course of the film is made all the more powerful because of it, and is one of the better origin stories for a character that I've seen.

 

Christian Bale turns in another solid performance as Bruce Wayne/Batman, although as far as the self-absorbed-billionaire/superhero is concerned, I have to give the edge to Robert Downey, Jr. as Tony Stark/Iron Man. I also got a little tired of his gravelly voice as Batman, although I understand the need to have him disguise it somehow. But still, he is by far the best Batman to date, bringing humanity to the character that was sorely lacking before.

 

The film is a long one, clocking in at around 2 1/2 hours, but there's not a wasted frame of film in it. I was riveted to the screen from the opening scene to the last frame. I was never sure where the film was going next - which is a good thing. I hate being able to predict what's going to happen in a movie. It's especially critical in this film to keep the audience off balance, since that's the very nature of The Joker. There are great stunts and action sequences in the film, excellent special effects (notably with one particular character in the latter half of the film), and finally a Gotham City that looks like a real, believable, modern city. Being able to see it in the daylight really grounds it in reality. There are some scenes in The Dark Knight that are disturbing. There's violence in this film - quite a lot of it. But they still manage to be restrained with it, and avoid it being gratuitous or overly-graphic. Sometimes it's better to let the imagination fill in the blanks, and that works very well here. As good as this film is though, I'd strongly suggest you pre-screen it first before bringing young kids.

 

Go see this film. It's really hard to classify it as a "superhero" film, because it transcends the genre. It's the best film of the Summer, and it's the best film I've seen in a long time. The downside? I don't see how they can top it.

 

I'm going to have to give this one... 10/10.

14 Comments


Recommended Comments

The downside? I don't see how they can top it.

 

That's true for all of my favourite movies :)

 

(Speaking of which, my wife just bought the Sweeney Todd DVD and insisted on me watching it, and to my very surprise I actually loved every minute of it :D :ponder:)

 

So did you skip "Get Smart"? I thought to watch it, while still waiting for Batman and Hellboy to arrive in Germany ;)

Link to comment
So did you skip "Get Smart"? I thought to watch it, while still waiting for Batman and Hellboy to arrive in Germany :ponder:

Skipped it. I had no desire to see the memory of Don Adams sullied. :)

 

I think I'm about done with movies for the Summer. Offhand, I can't think of anything else I want to go see.

Link to comment

You're sure you don't want to see Hellboy?

 

Well, there'll come another summer, I think next year we'll see Wolverine and The Watchmen amongst others :ponder:

Link to comment

The trailer for The Watchmen (shown with The Dark Knight) looks excellent (although I've heard that Alan Moore isn't too thrilled with the idea of a film version). Hellboy II seems more of a "watch it on TV" movie to me. Wolverine? Meh. Maybe I'll go see it.

 

The movie I really want to see... is TR2N.

 

Yeah baby. :ponder:

 

(Cleaned-up bootleg TR2N trailer is available here.)

Link to comment

Eh... That's the kind of sequel that doesn't make much sense, no?

 

And the recent game had a better title. Maybe they should've called it Tron 3.0 :ponder:

 

At least Sean Connery as the MCP sounds like fun :)

 

What I want much more is T4. That finally seems to be the movie I've been waiting for since T2; I always wanted to see a full "future" movie in this series. And Christian Bale as John Conner also sounds promising.

Link to comment

I'm hopeful TR2N is actually good. I've always thought there's a lot that could be done with it. John Lasseter (now head of Disney) is a big Tron fan, so I suspect he's got something to do with it getting the green light. Plus Jeff Bridges is back. Hope springs eternal, and all that.

 

I'll take a wait-and-see attitude with T4. Could be good - at least they aren't trying to pass Arnold off as an aging-ageless Terminator anymore.

 

I'm sadistically looking forward to the inevitably-awful Star Trek franchise reboot. I think it's going to be absolutely, completely awful. At least, I'm hoping so. I'd hate for it to just be "bad". I want it to be the worst film ever, so they just pack it in and let Star Trek rest in peace once and for all. :ponder:

Link to comment

No hope here. Life is happening in cycles, so it will come back anyway.

 

Who for example would have thought that Batman would ever return to the big screen after George Clooney and Joel Schumacher totally killed the franchise? :ponder:

Link to comment
Who for example would have thought that Batman would ever return to the big screen after George Clooney and Joel Schumacher totally killed the franchise? :)

True - if ever a franchise was dead and buried, that would have been the one. At the very least, I never expected it to return within such a relatively short amount of time.

 

But I'm still extremely skeptical about the new Star Trek movie. (And yet, I'm already assuming TR2N will be the most awesome movie ever, based on a mere 3 minutes of grainy preview bootleg footage. :ponder: )

Link to comment

Finally saw it this week. I fully agree on the 10/10, this one is a must see.

 

I was wondering why they were actually calling it Dark Knight though. IMO it was just a cheap marketing trick to get some "Frank Miller" link into the movie. About the only idea in this movie that felt inspired by the "Dark Knight" comic book, were the Batman copycats at the beginning of the movie.

 

Overall the story and mood, the Joker and Batman, seemed to draw much more inspiration from "The Killing Joke" Comic Book, which IMO would've been a more appropriate subtitle as well.

 

If you have never read "The Killing Joke", it shows quite some parallels to the movie. It's the story where the Joker tries to drive Gordon into insanity by attacking his family in the most brutal way. It's were Barbara Gordon gets the injuries forcing here into the wheelchair, ending her career as Batgirl.

 

While the Joker fails with Gordon there, he succeeds with Dent in the movie. The end of that part is almost the same, with Batman and Joker having a dialogue quite similar to their final dialogue on the big screen.

 

BTW: There's one scene in the movie I still don't get, that's the silly crash Batman has when going after the Joker with the motorcycle. Batman couldn't really expect the Joker to evade the motorcycle, or? But if the crash was just some "trick", it made him look pretty silly... ;)

 

BTW²: You didn't mention the oddity of Rachel not being played by Katie Holmes this time, I couldn't adjust to her "new look" the whole movie ;)

 

BTW³: I heard they ran out of money for Star Trek? :D

Link to comment
I was wondering why they were actually calling it Dark Knight though. IMO it was just a cheap marketing trick to get some "Frank Miller" link into the movie. About the only idea in this movie that felt inspired by the "Dark Knight" comic book, were the Batman copycats at the beginning of the movie.
Could be, but I didn't see it as an attempt to tell any part of that story. It seems to me he was referred to as "The Dark Knight" before Frank Miller's graphic novel, but I could be wrong.

 

If you have never read "The Killing Joke", it shows quite some parallels to the movie. It's the story where the Joker tries to drive Gordon into insanity by attacking his family in the most brutal way. It's were Barbara Gordon gets the injuries forcing here into the wheelchair, ending her career as Batgirl.
I read it when it first came out. I don't really recall it now.

 

BTW: There's one scene in the movie I still don't get, that's the silly crash Batman has when going after the Joker with the motorcycle. Batman couldn't really expect the Joker to evade the motorcycle, or? But if the crash was just some "trick", it made him look pretty silly... ;)
My take on it was that Batman was playing "chicken" with the Joker, and when the Joker didn't move, Batman dumped it to avoid killing him (since that would cross the line). It was a weird moment though, as if they were stuck in a plot point, and couldn't figure a better way out.

 

BTW²: You didn't mention the oddity of Rachel not being played by Katie Holmes this time, I couldn't adjust to her "new look" the whole movie ;)
Never even noticed. I guess I might have made some mental note of it, like "is that the same character from the last film?" but it didn't bother me any. Probably because I considered her a relatively minor character in the grand scheme of things.

 

BTW³: I heard they ran out of money for Star Trek? :D
I haven't heard anything about it. I know Paramount skipped Comicon since they didn't have any effects footage done.
Link to comment
I'm hopeful TR2N is actually good. I've always thought there's a lot that could be done with it. John Lasseter (now head of Disney) is a big Tron fan, so I suspect he's got something to do with it getting the green light. Plus Jeff Bridges is back. Hope springs eternal, and all that.

Well, no new trailer at this year's ComicCon, but they finally posted high-quality versions of the test footage. Also, Tron Legacy (as it's now called) already has a couple of viral websites online:

Flynn Lives

Home of Tron

 

Now if I can just manage to avoid any spoilers... :ponder:

Link to comment

Also at ComicCon, they re-created Flynn's Arcade from the movie, complete with a working

(about two minutes into the video), and
, a secret room with a full-sized mockup of the new light cycle. Very cool! I wish I could've been there for it.
Link to comment

Wow. That's pretty cool and no doubt cost a pretty penny or two to put that together.

 

There's something a little sad about the fact they went through all that expense and hoopla and it went largely unnoticed to the world outside of the convention. Like one of the Youtube comments suggests, you'd think that at least the G4 video game channel would have broke the story and eventually the other news stations would begin to insert tidbits of this news at the end of their newscast as one of their feel good stories. Their PR people should have done a better job hyping this IMHO. That is unless the intent was to record and distribute viral videos of the event online. If that's the case maybe we will see this news hit the mainstream in a week or two.

 

Either way, it looks like it was a great event and I hope the reason it has gone largely unannounced is NOT because I'm just too old and nobody cares about Tron anymore. Because that would really suck.

Link to comment
Either way, it looks like it was a great event and I hope the reason it has gone largely unannounced is NOT because I'm just too old and nobody cares about Tron anymore. Because that would really suck.

I suspect it was more because it was something geared specifically for the ComicCon crowd, and not necessarily for the mass media. I didn't see G4's ComicCon coverage, but I'd be surprised if I didn't get a brief mention somewhere on one of their shows. The viral websites (for example) so far are more for Tron nerds (raises hand) than to generate media buzz at this point, but I'm sure we'll see that change over the next year. The fact they're doing anything at this early of a date is something I find encouraging, and makes me

think they've probably got big plans for this thing.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...