Posted Sat Feb 8, 2003 1:10 PM
Excuse the long post:
I'm sure my opinion will be unpopular at this point but I think that, aside from the aforementioned lack of backlighting (which is extraordinarily frustrating), the GBA is a better console than the Lynx. The lack of backlighting is definitely a problem with certain games, like one of my favorites (Doom, the reason I bought the GBA in the first place), although there are other games I have for the system (Super Mario World, Zelda, Jazz Jackrabbit, Breath of Fire, Duke Nukem Advance, Ecks vs. Sever, Wolfenstein 3D), which are generally brighter and much easier to see under less-than-optimal lighting conditions. Still, it's not perfect.
And I don't necessarily mind the rehash of certain titles, because I never bought a Super NES so I never got a chance to play a lot of the re-released games before. Sometimes you just want to have a portable version of a game you really love (I'm keeping my fingers crossed for Super Mario 3). Other things I like are that I don't have to buy batteries in bulk all the time just to power the thing. Plus it can fit in my pocket and it feels good in my hands.
That being said, I have a Lynx (which I bought last year on E-bay for $75, and it came with 10 games [including Warbirds, Blue Lightning, Battle Wheels, and Xenophobe], a pouch, and an AC adapter), and I have around 30 games for it so far and am planning to buy more. I really like the Lynx and the GBA will never be able to replace my need to play classics like Roadblasters and Rampage.
I'm glad I have both systems (plus a Sega Game Gear, for Sonic games) because there are certain strengths to each platform, and the Lynx is a pretty darn awesome (and affordable) piece of Atari history, to boot. I never could have afforded one in 1989 (I was in junior high at the time), but I'm glad I have one now and would not trade it for anything, including a front-lit (which is not to be confused with the superior back-lighting of the Lynx) Game Boy Advance SP.