Jump to content
IGNORED

A Discussion of this forum's policies


doctorclu

Recommended Posts

Carmel, this thread is not about that. As I started WAY into this, this thread has NOTHING to do with Jaguar Sector 2.

 

What this is about is consistancy in the forum rules of Atariage, and a lifting of the censorship and strict rules here on the Jaguar forum.

 

Stay on target...

 

Exactly. It's about the pitchforks that come out everytime someone says they can make an emulator, or a flash device, or anything that might, possibly, even indirectly allow one game - and lets be VERY clear about this, there is, as far as I can see, only one developer on the entire planet who is trying to enforce this stupidity - to be loaded and played. And you can't even buy said game anyway. Except from ebay, where the money made doesn't even go to the charity it was supposed to go to anyway, it goes to the seller.

 

Anyway, thats beside the point. The point is, if this forums rules and regulations were applied to all the other forums on this site, there would be no AtariMax Flashcarts for your A8, no APE, no ProSYS. There would be no FlashCard for the Lynx. There would be no UltraSatan, no SatanDisk, no USB/Flash floppy devices for the ST/Falcon. No multiRom flashcards for the 2600. No way to play 7800 games. It would be like the dark ages all over again.

 

Ok, thats worst case senario. The points are all valid tho. We want the Jaguar to SURVIVE and FLOURISH. We want MORE GAMES. We want MORE DEVELOPERS. We *NEED* an open forum, with the same regulation as the other forums here, which have allowed the other formats to thrive and grow and expand into something wonderful. Allowing one small subset of the community to dictate and ride roughshot over everone else is a huge backwards step, here, and in any community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont' quite understand why one forum (this JSII place ) has or had got it in or another forum (AA), after all, since most peeps there probably come here and since most peeps here probably go there...It makes no sense to have infighting, can't both set of forum's just let it be and co-exist in blistfull harmony

 

After all, last thing you peeps want to do is scare people away from the jagauar

 

Carmel, this thread is not about that. As I started WAY into this, this thread has NOTHING to do with Jaguar Sector 2.

 

What this is about is consistancy in the forum rules of Atariage, and a lifting of the censorship and strict rules here on the Jaguar forum.

 

Stay on target...

 

 

 

 

 

I am trying to stay with it (as you put it Dr.) but i can't help it if i follow other peoples conversation threads within this thread...as we are talking about a whole range of issues here Dr.

 

Perhaps a rereleased or relaunched jaguar 'platform' will make the populous here happy and get the jaguar the 2 million target audience that JT originally attested to

 

 

Sorry but my head is beginning to hurt....can i chuck up now

Edited by carmel_andrews
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps a rereleased or relaunched jaguar 'platform' will make the populous here happy and get the jaguar the 2 million target audience that JT originally attested to

 

Carmel please go and start another thread somewhere where you can ramble on ignoring everything said previously, but please, PLEASE do not attempt to derail this thread. This thread is IMPORTANT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps a rereleased or relaunched jaguar 'platform' will make the populous here happy and get the jaguar the 2 million target audience that JT originally attested to

 

Carmel please go and start another thread somewhere where you can ramble on ignoring everything said previously, but please, PLEASE do not attempt to derail this thread. This thread is IMPORTANT.

 

Better get used to it... Carmel does that in about every thread he is in... just ignore it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What this is about is consistancy in the forum rules of Atariage, and a lifting of the censorship and strict rules here on the Jaguar forum.

So what exactly are you proposing? We've had two long pages of discussion, but I'm still uncertain as to what changes you want, exactly.

What do you want to happen?

 

Stay on target...

Good advice. Please stay on topic, folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What this is about is consistancy in the forum rules of Atariage, and a lifting of the censorship and strict rules here on the Jaguar forum.

So what exactly are you proposing? We've had two long pages of discussion, but I'm still uncertain as to what changes you want, exactly.

What do you want to happen?

 

 

Deleting the jaguar subforum rules and apply the general rules of the forum to it seems to be the general idea. There is no reason to have different rules to this subforum than there are in the whole atariage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what exactly are you proposing? We've had two long pages of discussion, but I'm still uncertain as to what changes you want, exactly.

What do you want to happen?

 

"What do you want?" is Mr Morden's line :P

 

As ChrisTOS said, the removal of the subforum with the explicit rules that are applied to this section. And the chasing down with pitchforks and flaming torches of the people trying to enforce dark-age type restrictions on the advancement of the Jaguar scene, instead of the people who are attempting to advance things. And more than anything, to see the Jaguar shine as the pinacle of Atari hardware.

Edited by Mr Morden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the Jaguar-specific 'rules': http://www.atariage.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=83064

There are really only three rules, and the first two are applied to the other Atari forums anyhow:

- Don't attack other users:

- Don't Troll

- Don't Discuss Piracy

So really, the only real change being proposed is allowing posters to discuss emulation, copying, backup, and such topics that might be considered 'piracy'-related.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the Jaguar-specific 'rules': http://www.atariage.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=83064

There are really only three rules, and the first two are applied to the other Atari forums anyhow:

- Don't attack other users:

- Don't Troll

- Don't Discuss Piracy

So really, the only real change being proposed is allowing posters to discuss emulation, copying, backup, and such topics that might be considered 'piracy'-related.

 

The first two are common sense. The last one is taken to the nth extreme, only here, in this one place, where in all the other forums it has spawned discussions leading to many amazing and wonderful things (Like AtariMax FlashROM, etc)

 

And for no good reason, it would seem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. It's about the pitchforks that come out everytime someone says they can make an emulator, or a flash device, or anything that might, possibly, even indirectly allow one game - and lets be VERY clear about this, there is, as far as I can see, only one developer on the entire planet who is trying to enforce this stupidity - to be loaded and played.

Wrong, there are a few different people. You're right... it's so stupid that these indie developers want to protect their work from being copied and passed around... man... the nerve :roll:

And you can't even buy said game anyway. Except from ebay, where the money made doesn't even go to the charity it was supposed to go to anyway, it goes to the seller.

Wow, you seem to have a lot of disinformation coming at you since your arrival here and granted, that can be chalked up to the fact that you're new... but once again, before you go spouting off about something you know nothing about, get the facts. Every year this seller (aka developer) does a charity bike ride. He not only asks for donations on the diabetes Tour De Cure site, but he also sells one copy of BS on EBay. I don't know where you got your information about him keeping the money, but it makes no sense when he:

1. Is adamant about raising money for fighting diabetes and

2. Doesn't even need the money.

 

Once again, we've been brought off-topic with disinformation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong, there are a few different people. You're right... it's so stupid that these indie developers want to protect their work from being copied and passed around... man... the nerve :roll:

 

It's off topic, but I feel like a comment. Your stance implies that the majority of Jaguar fans who buy recent Jaguar games are only buying them because they have no option... that they would simply stop doing that & that they are mostly closet pirates & would rather copy games than buy them if it wasn't for people such as our good self protecting the devs. That's more than paranoid, eh? It's been said many times before, look to the examples set on other systems. If devs don't want their stuff copied, put up a disclaimer, make it known, the vast majority of people will respect that because they respect the effort of the devs. The few that won't were likely not going to be customers & more likely to be rom collectors who just aren't worth the effort of considering.

 

Once again, we've been brought off-topic with disinformation.

Fight the good fight, comrade, this disinformation must be obliterated. On to the topic of the discussion of this forum's policies!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the OP. It does seem odd that piracy type topics are not allowed in the Jaguar forum, but allowed in the other areas of the site. While I respect developers who don't wish for there work to be pirated (in the case of BS), but what about Checkered Flag? Cybermorph? Club Drive?

 

As previously stated, this site HOSTS ROMS (if that isn't piracy, I don't know what is) for other systems. But not the Jaguar. I think Dr. is accurate that it is hypocritical to limit information and discussion on the grey areas of the Jaguar. With the recent exposure from AVGN and new development from the skunkboard, I imagine this scene is going to get bigger. New people are not going to tolerate the old rules this community used to abide by. As seen in this topic, very few people seem to support the old ways of zero tolerance.

 

The Jag scene in general is a very small and dedicated group. It is definitely a special place to be a part of, but I don't think it can survive let alone grow, with the current mind set.

 

I think topics like backing up should be allowed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jag scene in general is a very small and dedicated group. It is definitely a special place to be a part of, but I don't think it can survive let alone grow, with the current mind set.

 

The ayes have it - if this was an election it would be a landslide victory for common sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks kgenthe some good supporting points of this thread.

 

For those of you that expressed some confusion here on the fourth page of this thread, let me just summarize what is being asked here.

 

There was a comment on the "nerve" of developers wanting to protect their product. I can see the confusion here. We have the policy of not talking about "anything piracy" here, and that has been taken to the extreme.

 

The rules again...

- Don't attack other users:

- Don't Troll

- Don't Discuss Piracy

So I looked to the other Atari hardware forums for inspiration. Maybe look at the rules of the other successful forums to see how they worded their rules and take some notes. I noticed something very interesting they all have in common...

 

THEY ALL DON'T HAVE ANY RULES. :P

 

Check it if you don't be believe me. Most of them don't have pinned topics. The 5200 one locked thread recently which was the "5200 vs. Coleco" thread which was closed because "It was becoming a Jaguar thread". I thought that said volumes. The 8-bit forum has a pinned topic, and that is "restoration of hardware" thread.

 

What did I learn from this? First off, we need to ask ourselves, who is actually the moderator of this forum? Is it Al? Al is the one who locks down threads and I don't see anyone else doing it. But who is actually the moderator here?

 

Second, I would submit to them to replace a negative like "rules" since no other Atari hardware thread had one, and replace it with a FAQ like the Atari 8-bit has.

 

In that FAQ I would put in there ways to get CD units working, parts you need to replace when you use a wrong power supply on the Jaguar, ways to back up CD's for preservation, good places to start when looking for programming resources, will there be another Skunkboard run? Etc.

 

I am on a Newton list and that approach has worked very well. People ask questions, we refer them to the FAQ. So if put in the FAQ how to back up discs, when that question gets asked rather than it getting locked, we could just say "Check out the FAQ, let us know if you have any questions beyond that."

 

So what do we want? To be like the other Atari forums.

How do we get there? Remove the rules thread.

What do we replace it with? A positive, a frequently asked question thread.

 

Or replace it with nothing at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what do we want? To be like the other Atari forums.

How do we get there? Remove the rules thread.

What do we replace it with? A positive, a frequently asked question thread.

 

Or replace it with nothing at all.

 

I think you have made this a much easier decision for the moderator with your excellent recommendations. Bravo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ill volunteer to be a moderator on this forum. :D Id help crack down on the pro-piracy people. Vote for me,vote BuddyBuddies for Jaguar forum moderator! :P

 

Requesting for previous message, as well as this one, to be deleted from this thread as being totally irrelevant to the subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ill volunteer to be a moderator on this forum. :D Id help crack down on the pro-piracy people. Vote for me,vote BuddyBuddies for Jaguar forum moderator! :P

 

It's OK having a laugh now & again, and that certainly is laughable, but come on, this is a serious subject & we're doing out best to keep it focused, please don't foul your bowl again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ill volunteer to be a moderator on this forum. :D Id help crack down on the pro-piracy people. Vote for me,vote BuddyBuddies for Jaguar forum moderator! :P

 

It's OK having a laugh now & again, and that certainly is laughable, but come on, this is a serious subject & we're doing out best to keep it focused, please don't foul your bowl again.

I was serious... To help Albert out on the Jaguar forum here on Atariage,im volunteering. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If devs don't want their stuff copied, put up a disclaimer, make it known, the vast majority of people will respect that because they respect the effort of the devs. The few that won't were likely not going to be customers & more likely to be rom collectors who just aren't worth the effort of considering.

It's illegal to host roms without the 'dev's permission.

The 'devs' must first give permission to host their roms before it becomes legal.

 

Stop saying its ok to pirate until the owner tracks you down and tells you to stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's illegal to host roms without the 'dev's permission.

The 'devs' must first give permission to host their roms before it becomes legal.

 

Stop saying its ok to pirate until the owner tracks you down and tells you to stop.

That is part of the point doctorclu is trying to make. AA already hosts hundreds of roms without permission. You can download nearly the entire 2600, 5200, and 7800 game libraries. You can even sort the game lists by whether or not a rom is available!

 

It's strange that AA hosts roms for Atari's other systems, yet does not allow any type of Jaguar backing-up, piracy, grey area, discussions.

Edited by kgenthe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not into the "Jaguar Scene" and have never really got into playing the system other then testing it and the CD to make sure they work before selling and watching someone else play.

I do however think that this thread itself shows why no matter what decision would be made someone or a group of people would be vocal about not being happy about it. Even being able to differentiate that system as having it's own "scene" sets it apart. Which is probably why things stand as they are. General Chat also does have strict rules posted btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...