Would have been nice if Antic just had a bitsetting... there's probably no internal difference between Pal/NSTC Antic other than a few constants relating to vertical timing.
And with a good modern TV, it should easily tolerate the resultant timing difference thanks to the slightly slower Pal system clock.
Pal / NTSC Differences
Started by snicklin, Feb 28 2010 2:50 PM
29 replies to this topic
#26
Posted Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:07 AM
#28
Posted Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:51 AM
I've read that Amigas do that too. I do know that an awful lot of TVs will display it.
#29
Posted Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:28 AM
potatohead, on Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:51 AM, said:
I've read that Amigas do that too. I do know that an awful lot of TVs will display it.
Edited by Lazarus, Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:29 AM.
#30
Posted Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:37 AM
ST can also do 50/60 switch, C= Plus/4 the same. Although I believe the Amiga and Plus/4 retain the same cycles per scanline and the system clocks are slightly different between systems, like the A8.
I would guess that any TV that happily displays 50/60 refresh rates would probably be fine with the slightly off-spec horizontal frequency. And, all systems mentioned still use the native encoding... not sure about inside the US, but the rest of us tend to call NTSC by NTSC 3.59 or NTSC 4.3 depending on whether it uses it's native, or PAL type encoding.
I would guess that any TV that happily displays 50/60 refresh rates would probably be fine with the slightly off-spec horizontal frequency. And, all systems mentioned still use the native encoding... not sure about inside the US, but the rest of us tend to call NTSC by NTSC 3.59 or NTSC 4.3 depending on whether it uses it's native, or PAL type encoding.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














