For whatever reason, I tend to dislike stories in games. Maybe this has something to do with my own age -- growing up in an era when the motivations of Pac-Man didn't require explanation. So, while I played a little bit of the campaign, I abandoned it without care.
Multiplayer, for me, is where it is at. Killzone 2 is quite good in this respect. And for all that its natural to lump all the FPS games together, there are a lot of nuances between most of them that make each a compellingly different experience. And within the confines of the genre, Killzone 2 and Gears of War are dramatically unalike; here, enjoying one, in no way should suggest you would enjoy the other.
There was an article released, recently, from a military officer as to which game is the most realistic. The dust effects in CoD MF 2 (if memory serves), scored points; but for actual gameplay, Killzone 2 felt the most realistic. Killzone 2 has a sense of inertia, so that running begins a little slowly and doesn't end immediate; and the speed at which one can bring the scope to your face feels vastly more realistic. Realism isn't a selling point for me -- I don't need realism in games, and, frankly, prefer that I not recreate the horrors of life with any fidelity. But, the physics do separate it from other games, and probably appeals to a different type of player.
And while I don't want to get sucked into the hype, Killzone 3 has my hopes up. Apparently the controls are a little tighter (less realistic, I'm guessing), which some people will like.
I've not play it in a while. As far as shooters go, Bad Company 2 is my obsession. But if you want to play with some AtariAgers some time, my PSN ID is the same as what I use on these forums.
Edited by durkada, Sun Feb 6, 2011 7:19 AM.