So i guess that its really not worth it, to really try to push the Jag with an FM engine, if its only gonna be a bit better than the Genesis.
At least there were some good examples of sound engines, like Super Burnout.
The Jag and 3DO are always compared in terms of graphics, but i wonder how they compare to each other when it comes to sound. Was the 3DO soundchip comparable to the Jags, in terms of capabilities?
All this post is a personnal view, i love Genesis sytem too even Amiga one (a little bit less but too ) so please don't start a flamme war thanks
GT Turbo
The ST version sounds a lot more aggressive whereas the Amiga version sounds rather effeminate. But it didn't appear that they were done by the same artist so I don't think it's really a fair comparison. This is like Trent Reznor vs. John Tesh.
But it didn't appear that they were done by the same artist
HOL and Mobygames say it's the same. After all, since Jochen spent lots of time making a cross-platform format (TFMX) for writing music, it'd be silly to let other people do the music
But it didn't appear that they were done by the same artist
HOL and Mobygames say it's the same. After all, since Jochen spent lots of time making a cross-platform format (TFMX) for writing music, it'd be silly to let other people do the music
All this post is a personnal view, i love Genesis sytem too even Amiga one (a little bit less but too ) so please don't start a flamme war thanks
GT Turbo
The ST version sounds a lot more aggressive whereas the Amiga version sounds rather effeminate. But it didn't appear that they were done by the same artist so I don't think it's really a fair comparison. This is like Trent Reznor vs. John Tesh.
The ST is clearly mono, and sounds unfiltered. The Amiga is clearly stereo and sounds filtered. The mono music on the ST adds channels together to help the base, while the Amiga is spread over two channels. Add the unknown filtering and you have the differences in the two.
The ST version sounds good in the title sequence - but in the actual game it sounds really muffled compared to the Amiga version. ( Makes sense, as you can allocate more cpu time to run the sample player at a higher frequency )
( Also is this ST or STe? as that would make a big difference to the quality of the audio )
The ST is clearly mono, and sounds unfiltered. The Amiga is clearly stereo and sounds filtered. The mono music on the ST adds channels together to help the base, while the Amiga is spread over two channels. Add the unknown filtering and you have the differences in the two.
I'm no talking about stereo but what the sounds like. You can add all filters you want, you can't do with a 'sampler player' all things you can do with the Yamaha. A very little example (In 128 bytes !) :
And when you type amiga 128 byte song on youtube you finish on Gwem (Atari ST demo!!), it's very more difficult to play a music in 128 bytes on amiga. You can play sample with the Yamaha, but it's a little bit more difficult to emulate the Yamaha with Paula. With the Yamaha you can generate song and not just play or recalculate them. That's the difference.
After it's like people love their songs, personnaly i love this kind of sound because, you have a new 'instrument' on each music, not like on amiga, where people always use the same sample bank and lot of songs sound like another one. I love some modules too, example Sectornotfound in Reboot's Superfly ( ), because this module is different from a lot of amiga modules i have heard, sample i haven't heard before and a feeling, a spirit.
So the only important thing is we love music so don't stop it !! (Even if it' s an amiga module )
I'm no talking about stereo but what the sounds like. You can add all filters you want, you can't do with a 'sampler player' all things you can do with the Yamaha. A very little example (In 128 bytes !) :
Indeed you can't do with a sample player the things you can do with the Yamaha.
However the WoD intro song isn't a good example of this since in both cases (ST & Amiga) it is sample based. As Chilly Willy said, the ST version seems better because it's in mono ( which is better for the bass).
Also the ST version uses a lower sampling rate and is more grainy (a side effect of the trick used to make the Yamaha play samples). This is what makes the ST version sounds "deeper" and "more aggressive".
The Amiga version is too clean.
It's a bit like old vinyl record vs CD.
However, more proof that Atari is where it is at. The Amiga has Paula which essentially does everything for you and is, easy mode playback.. Only Atari kids hav ethe mad skillz and soul to get ossum sounds out of audio hardware in hardmode.. none of this pussy Amiga Paula hax rubbish for us Atari kids.. RRRAAAAARRRRRRR!!!