Jump to content



2

Real SNES vs Wii Virtual Console


55 replies to this topic

#51 rockman_x_2002 OFFLINE  

rockman_x_2002

    Stargunner

  • 1,528 posts
  • Location:Mississippi, USA

Posted Sun Feb 5, 2012 5:44 PM

Nothing beat the original hardware.

Having said that, I will say it depends on how truly serious you are about collecting for the system. SNES stuff is still fairly easy to come by (some games more so than others). Plus, on the Wii, the games are emulated without very much filtering, leaving you with a very pixelated image (not that there's a thing in the world wrong with that). Using actual hardware, however, may obscure some of that, but that applies only to older CRT televisions. If you have all modern flatscreen HDTVs in the house, you won't be gaining those benefits that an actual console will net you.

That being said, yes, the Wii Virtual Console is cheaper and, if it has all (or most of) the games you want and you have no desire to collect the original hardware, go that route. If you have any interest at all in collecting for the system, drop the extra cash and go for it. And if you have an old CRT kicking about, most especially go for it. The classic experience is priceless.

#52 mbd30 OFFLINE  

mbd30

    Stargunner

  • 1,445 posts
  • Location:Hope, Arkansas

Posted Sun Feb 5, 2012 6:15 PM

View Postrockman_x_2002, on Sun Feb 5, 2012 5:44 PM, said:

Plus, on the Wii, the games are emulated without very much filtering, leaving you with a very pixelated image

Is that because filtering would use too much CPU overhead on the Wii? Not the most powerful console.

#53 rockman_x_2002 OFFLINE  

rockman_x_2002

    Stargunner

  • 1,528 posts
  • Location:Mississippi, USA

Posted Sun Feb 5, 2012 6:18 PM

View Postmbd30, on Sun Feb 5, 2012 6:15 PM, said:

View Postrockman_x_2002, on Sun Feb 5, 2012 5:44 PM, said:

Plus, on the Wii, the games are emulated without very much filtering, leaving you with a very pixelated image

Is that because filtering would use too much CPU overhead on the Wii? Not the most powerful console.

Actually it appears to be purely a design choice. Emulators running through hacked means can handle the filtering and all the trimmings just fine and they look great that way. Blows the mind as to why Nintendo decided to skimp on these features.

#54 Austin OFFLINE  

Austin

    Quadrunner

  • 5,577 posts
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted Sun Feb 5, 2012 6:20 PM

View Postrockman_x_2002, on Sun Feb 5, 2012 6:18 PM, said:

Actually it appears to be purely a design choice. Emulators running through hacked means can handle the filtering and all the trimmings just fine and they look great that way. Blows the mind as to why Nintendo decided to skimp on these features.

I think Nintendo was going for the truest look possible.

#55 Tenorman OFFLINE  

Tenorman

    Star Raider

  • 89 posts

Posted Sun Feb 5, 2012 7:09 PM

I actually like the way SNES games look on VC. I use component cables and the games look very clean. I don't think it would have hurt for Ninento to at least have the option to do filtering on the VC games, but I personally hate it.

That being said, go buy a SNES. You won't regret it. I know I personally wouldn't be able to sleep at night if I didn't own a Genesis, a SNES, and a TG-16. Absolutely the best generation of gaming period.

#56 goldenegg OFFLINE  

goldenegg

    Dragonstomper

  • 518 posts

Posted Sun Feb 5, 2012 7:53 PM

View PostAustin, on Sun Feb 5, 2012 6:20 PM, said:

View Postrockman_x_2002, on Sun Feb 5, 2012 6:18 PM, said:

Actually it appears to be purely a design choice. Emulators running through hacked means can handle the filtering and all the trimmings just fine and they look great that way. Blows the mind as to why Nintendo decided to skimp on these features.

I think Nintendo was going for the truest look possible.

+1!

A lot of people, myself included, hate using filters.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users