Jump to content



9

TurboFreezer XL/XE 2011 preorder starts now


110 replies to this topic

#101 HiassofT OFFLINE  

HiassofT

    Dragonstomper

  • 649 posts
  • Location:Salzburg, Austria

Posted Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:58 AM

View PostStephen, on Fri Mar 9, 2012 1:54 PM, said:

I really hate to even ask, but are there any updates to this?
No problem with asking :-)

Current status is: still delayed

I'm still very busy with my job and haven't been able to work on it (writing the docs, start production planning) since december last year :-( This week I got an email from Wolfram, as I suspected he's still waiting for telephone and DSL.

so long,

Hias

#102 Larry OFFLINE  

Larry

    Stargunner

  • 1,730 posts
  • Location:U.S. -- Midwest

Posted Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:45 PM

It would not solve all the time constraints, but feasible to sell as a KIT? (I looked briefly through the thread but didn't see an pics of the actual internals of the freezer, and if it has SMT components, that probably rules out a kit.)

-Larry


View PostHiassofT, on Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:58 AM, said:


No problem with asking :-)

Current status is: still delayed

I'm still very busy with my job and haven't been able to work on it (writing the docs, start production planning) since december last year :-( This week I got an email from Wolfram, as I suspected he's still waiting for telephone and DSL.

so long,

Hias


#103 HiassofT OFFLINE  

HiassofT

    Dragonstomper

  • 649 posts
  • Location:Salzburg, Austria

Posted Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:07 AM

Hi Larry!

View PostLarry, on Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:45 PM, said:

It would not solve all the time constraints, but feasible to sell as a KIT? (I looked briefly through the thread but didn't see an pics of the actual internals of the freezer, and if it has SMT components, that probably rules out a kit.)
Only very few components are THT, here's a pic of the PCBs:
freezer-pcbs.jpg
Selling it as a kit wouldn't make too much sense, you'd need a JTAG programming cable and be experienced in soldering fine-pitch SMT stuff (even I don't like soldering TQFP, so I leave this to Wolfram :-)

The hardware and software is finished but we still have to do 2 important things:

I have to write the docs. The German manual is approx 2/3 finished (currently on page 40 or so) but I haven't started with the English version yet. Selling the TurboFreezer without a manual doesn't make any sense, you wouldn't know how to use all it's features.

We have to get quotes for all the components, PCBs etc, check assembly-, packaging- and shipping costs to calculate the final price. The price calculation is very thight, we don't make any money from it, but also can't afford to make a loss.

so long,

Hias

#104 sloopy OFFLINE  

sloopy

    River Patroller

  • 2,258 posts
  • lookin for bits, i like bits...
  • Location:in my cave of despair, surrounded by toys...

Posted Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:43 AM

looks simple to assemble, I will take 3 kits ;'D

they look nice.

sloopy.

#105 Larry OFFLINE  

Larry

    Stargunner

  • 1,730 posts
  • Location:U.S. -- Midwest

Posted Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:50 AM

They sure do look nice! I figured there would be SMT components -- scares me!

Thanks for the pics.

-Larry

#106 flashjazzcat OFFLINE  

flashjazzcat

    Quadrunner

  • 5,408 posts
  • Jumping through hOOPs...
  • Location:United Kingdom

Posted Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:23 AM

Very nice! Regarding a kit - only thing which would intimidate me is that Xilinx, but I need to learn sometime. :)

#107 candle OFFLINE  

candle

    Stargunner

  • 1,909 posts
  • Location:Lublin, Poland

Posted Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:36 AM

why 3 board design?
if this is all of components that are there, then you should fit on that bottom board ;)

#108 HiassofT OFFLINE  

HiassofT

    Dragonstomper

  • 649 posts
  • Location:Salzburg, Austria

Posted Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:25 PM

View Postcandle, on Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:36 AM, said:

why 3 board design?
if this is all of components that are there, then you should fit on that bottom board ;)
Wolfram had routing problems, especially with the 2 PLCC flashes- using TSSOP would have been easier to route but he got a good price on those PLCC chips :)

so long,

Hias

#109 candle OFFLINE  

candle

    Stargunner

  • 1,909 posts
  • Location:Lublin, Poland

Posted Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:55 PM

it would be hard to route with passthough on the other end, but with 4 layer pcb it should be a cheaper solution than 3 board design
you don't want to deal with loose connectors issues - its already complicated as it is, without this kind of b-s ;)
if you need some help - just ask

#110 HiassofT OFFLINE  

HiassofT

    Dragonstomper

  • 649 posts
  • Location:Salzburg, Austria

Posted Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:20 PM

View Postcandle, on Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:55 PM, said:

it would be hard to route with passthough on the other end, but with 4 layer pcb it should be a cheaper solution than 3 board design
Back then when we started designing and checked PCB prices 4-layer wasn't an option. It was much more expensive than 2-layer.

BTW: just saw that iteadstudio is now also offering 4-layer PCBs (but only in prototype quantities). Still the price is 3-4 times the price of a 2-layer.

so long,

Hias

#111 candle OFFLINE  

candle

    Stargunner

  • 1,909 posts
  • Location:Lublin, Poland

Posted Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:21 PM

check technoservice - prices are very reasonable, not to mention if you decide to go china




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users