Jump to content



0

Phear


19 replies to this topic

#1 atari2600land ONLINE  

atari2600land

    Quadrunner

  • 6,496 posts
  • All hail the zyzzyva!
  • Location:Salem, Oregon

Posted Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:57 PM

This is not listed in the AA rarity guide. Fifth from the final item on this page:
http://www.platypusc...nteverhave.html
Anyone have any info on this one?

#2 JagChris OFFLINE  

JagChris

    Stargunner

  • 1,600 posts
  • Location:Oregon

Posted Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:31 PM

I wonder if the Dyno Park Tycoon was ever released.

#3 rush6432 OFFLINE  

rush6432

    Chopper Commander

  • 227 posts
  • Location:Austin,TX

Posted Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:32 PM

Ahh phear... it became tetrisphere for the n64....

Weather or not a prototype/beta exists is still un-confirmed. There is a video of it somewhere i thought.... i could be wrong though.

Edited by rush6432, Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:32 PM.


#4 Austin ONLINE  

Austin

    Quadrunner

  • 5,586 posts
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:35 PM

The Jaguar rarity list hasn't been updated in a while. There's a lot of homebrew stuff missing from it that should be there. From what I can gather, it's not really focused on cancelled games either with the exception of a couple.

View PostJagChris, on Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:31 PM, said:

I wonder if the Dyno Park Tycoon was ever released.

Yes, for the 3DO, it was.

#5 Gaztee OFFLINE  

Gaztee

    Dragonstomper

  • 887 posts
  • Location:Birmingham, UK

Posted Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:24 AM

As far as I am aware there is one copy somewhere, but it will never see the light of day as Nintendo will sue there person if it does!

#6 onlysublime OFFLINE  

onlysublime

    Moonsweeper

  • 453 posts

Posted Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:15 PM

played Tetrisphere via emulator the other day... such an incredibly awesome game. simple at the surface and deeper the more you play it. So sad that Nintendo snatched this away from the Jag. I remember reading the promising previews of it before Nintendo put down the cash.

I'm surprised that Nintendo hasn't rereleased this game as either a new release for the Wii or via their emulator offerings.

I hope that one day someone makes a facsimile of this and releases it on some other platform, be it Xbox Live Indie Games, XBLA, PSN, Android, iOS, Windows Phone, etc. Would suck that this game die in obscurity.

#7 rush6432 OFFLINE  

rush6432

    Chopper Commander

  • 227 posts
  • Location:Austin,TX

Posted Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:05 PM

Unfortunatly atari probably wasnt going to offer them much for it and nintendo waved the cash in front of them. Given how atari treated developers back then for the jag id say it probably wasnt a bad move on the phear developers part...

#8 JagChris OFFLINE  

JagChris

    Stargunner

  • 1,600 posts
  • Location:Oregon

Posted Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:10 PM

View Postrush6432, on Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:05 PM, said:

Unfortunatly atari probably wasnt going to offer them much for it and nintendo waved the cash in front of them. Given how atari treated developers back then for the jag id say it probably wasnt a bad move on the phear developers part...

I'd agree with Rush. Its too bad they went with Nintendo but Atari most likely didnt see what Nintendo saw at that convention. Which was apparently a great game and a great development team. If they did they would of taken steps to make sure the Phear team was locked down to finish the game on the Jaguar. But they weren't known for making the smartest decisions.

#9 BuddyBuddies OFFLINE  

BuddyBuddies

    River Patroller

  • 2,194 posts
  • Location:A Secret Place

Posted Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:19 AM

Lots of games were finished completely and lost, Ishar 3, Highlander 2 , Highlander 3, Kid Grid , Country Grid, Tinhead, Creature Shock, and many others.. The demo was shown of Phear so i'm sure it was atleast somewhat completed. Nintendo would have seen what they were paying for. Truth is the ROM is most likely buried for legal reasons.

#10 wozencl OFFLINE  

wozencl

    Star Raider

  • 78 posts

Posted Wed Feb 1, 2012 8:28 AM

View PostBuddyBuddies, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:19 AM, said:

Lots of games were finished completely and lost, Ishar 3, Highlander 2 , Highlander 3, Kid Grid , Country Grid, Tinhead, Creature Shock, and many others.. The demo was shown of Phear so i'm sure it was atleast somewhat completed. Nintendo would have seen what they were paying for. Truth is the ROM is most likely buried for legal reasons.

Were all of those games actually completed? I've seen the game design document for a Highlander sequel but nothing more concrete than that. It'd be interesting to have a list of games that are actually known to have been completed but remain unreleased/unseen in the wild.

#11 rush6432 OFFLINE  

rush6432

    Chopper Commander

  • 227 posts
  • Location:Austin,TX

Posted Wed Feb 1, 2012 8:36 AM

Highlander 2 exists.... someone has it here i think and its completed from what i heard but doubtfull it will get out..:(

#12 Austin ONLINE  

Austin

    Quadrunner

  • 5,586 posts
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:15 PM

View PostBuddyBuddies, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:19 AM, said:

Lots of games were finished completely and lost, Ishar 3, Highlander 2 , Highlander 3, Kid Grid , Country Grid, Tinhead, Creature Shock

Doesn't look like we're missing much then. :lol:

#13 save2600 OFFLINE  

save2600

    Quadrunner

  • 5,805 posts
  • Location:WI

Posted Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:20 PM

View PostAustin, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:15 PM, said:

View PostBuddyBuddies, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:19 AM, said:

Lots of games were finished completely and lost, Ishar 3, Highlander 2 , Highlander 3, Kid Grid , Country Grid, Tinhead, Creature Shock

Doesn't look like we're missing much then. :lol:

Who knows... maybe it was vastly improved? Be awesome to see some of those supposed finished titles released someday.

#14 Austin ONLINE  

Austin

    Quadrunner

  • 5,586 posts
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:06 PM

View Postsave2600, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:20 PM, said:

Who knows... maybe it was vastly improved?

My guess is probably not. :lol:

#15 save2600 OFFLINE  

save2600

    Quadrunner

  • 5,805 posts
  • Location:WI

Posted Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:22 PM

View PostAustin, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:06 PM, said:

View Postsave2600, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:20 PM, said:

Who knows... maybe it was vastly improved?

My guess is probably not. :lol:
;)

Probably, but look at Cybermorph<>Battlemorph. In the case of Highlander, like to think a sequel to such a horribly executed game would try to redeem itself. You know, people learning from their mistakes... that whole chestnut. :lol:

#16 Austin ONLINE  

Austin

    Quadrunner

  • 5,586 posts
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:43 PM

View Postsave2600, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:22 PM, said:

View PostAustin, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:06 PM, said:

View Postsave2600, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:20 PM, said:

Who knows... maybe it was vastly improved?
My guess is probably not. :lol:
;) Probably, but look at Cybermorph<>Battlemorph. In the case of Highlander, like to think a sequel to such a horribly executed game would try to redeem itself. You know, people learning from their mistakes... that whole chestnut. :lol:

True, but Battlemorph came out a couple of years after Cybermorph. My guess is if Highlander 2 was complete (and they were even working on a third), it was probably a rush job if it was finished only a year after the original came out. :( That's just speculation, of course.

#17 Jag_Slave OFFLINE  

Jag_Slave

    Moonsweeper

  • 391 posts
  • Location:Kansas

Posted Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:05 PM

The real pity is when members get their hands on unreleased betas, or unreleased completed games, or source code... they just sit on it. Even releasing the game for free is possible, but I think some people just like feeling important.

#18 JagChris OFFLINE  

JagChris

    Stargunner

  • 1,600 posts
  • Location:Oregon

Posted Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:07 PM

View Postsave2600, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:22 PM, said:

View PostAustin, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:06 PM, said:

View Postsave2600, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:20 PM, said:

Who knows... maybe it was vastly improved?

My guess is probably not. :lol:
;)

Probably, but look at Cybermorph<>Battlemorph. In the case of Highlander, like to think a sequel to such a horribly executed game would try to redeem itself. You know, people learning from their mistakes... that whole chestnut. :lol:

I don't think in any way shape or form was BattleMorph vastly improved over Cybermorph. What was that 3do space shooter game we were all discussing a few threads back? Now that's what Battlemorph should of been over Cybermorph. Not the half ass poke at a sequel we ended up getting.

#19 Austin ONLINE  

Austin

    Quadrunner

  • 5,586 posts
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:16 PM

View PostJagChris, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:07 PM, said:

I don't think in any way shape or form was BattleMorph vastly improved over Cybermorph. What was that 3do space shooter game we were all discussing a few threads back? Now that's what Battlemorph should of been over Cybermorph. Not the half ass poke at a sequel we ended up getting.

To each their own of course, but I felt Battlemorph had some nice upgrades that made it far more interesting to play. Eerie music, the ability to go under water (and the music flipping on the fly), the tunnels, the varied missions (instead of collecting the same capsules each and every mission), the bit of texture mapping added, the bosses, etc., etc. I actually feel comfortable in saying that Battlemorph is a GOOD game. Cybermorph, not so much. It's fun once in a while, but it's lacking in so many areas.

#20 JagChris OFFLINE  

JagChris

    Stargunner

  • 1,600 posts
  • Location:Oregon

Posted Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:27 PM

View PostAustin, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:16 PM, said:

View PostJagChris, on Wed Feb 1, 2012 6:07 PM, said:

I don't think in any way shape or form was BattleMorph vastly improved over Cybermorph. What was that 3do space shooter game we were all discussing a few threads back? Now that's what Battlemorph should of been over Cybermorph. Not the half ass poke at a sequel we ended up getting.

To each their own of course, but I felt Battlemorph had some nice upgrades that made it far more interesting to play. Eerie music, the ability to go under water (and the music flipping on the fly), the tunnels, the varied missions (instead of collecting the same capsules each and every mission), the bit of texture mapping added, the bosses, etc., etc. I actually feel comfortable in saying that Battlemorph is a GOOD game. Cybermorph, not so much. It's fun once in a while, but it's lacking in so many areas.

Yeah I agree it had some nice upgrades but it just wasn't enough overall IMO. There were parts that were completely lazy. How about the force fields? How about the electrical power lines from the batteries to the force fields or whatnot? They were just little floating squares going by. They could of done better than that for a graphic effect. They didnt even try. And the developers fascination with our ship shooting 'ping pong balls'. And the flying homing missile hammer, what the hell was that? A homing hammer that flies around and bonks the enemy on the head? Interesting as a lark but goofy and out of touch for the developers to put ih as a serious feature IMO. The fish were the same size as the submarines.

I dunno maybe I'm too picky I just thought the upgrades were the bare minimum they could get by with to call it a sequel.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users