Just a few minutes ago I decided to experiment with alternative controllers. I actually own a Sears Super Video Arcade, which has detachable controllers, and since they have the standard 9-pin plugs that 2600 controllers have, I figured why not try some Atari controllers on it? My test game was Astrosmash.
CX-40 JOYSTICK: No effect, whatsoever.
VIDEO TOUCH PAD: Merely PLUGGING IT IN caused the game to start. I found that if I pushed two buttons simultaneously in the 1st row or 3rd row, I would move left AND shoot (once). Pushing two buttons simultaneously in the 2nd and 4th rows likewise moved right and shot once.
Then I gave up the research and decided to just play a few games with the regular crap disc controllers that come with the system. Here were my observations of the games I played:
ASTROSMASH:
Nice concept. Jerky motion (owing to the 20 Hz sprite refresh we've been discussing in another thread). The way the bonus lives are awarded makes this game too easy, even if you're barely trying. It's really hard to have a game end unless you just put down the controller.
ROYAL DEALER:
Graphics are clearly superior to Atari 2600 in detail, but another case where the Intellivision's limit of 16 on-screen colors is really obvious. Nice to have a console version of Hearts for a very laid-back playing experience. This game definitely could not exist with this level of detail on the 2600, but at the same time... ehh... not too exciting.
LADY BUG:
I used to love playing this in the arcade. It's a fairly good adaptation, and again something that would be difficult/impossible to recreate on the 2600. But still, the sound shredded my eardrums and the motion was kind of jerky.
LOCK 'N' CHASE:
Ugh. What a piece of crap! The fact that this was proudly marketed as a superior alternative to 2600 Pac-Man shows just how bad 2600 Pac-Man really is. Ugly, stupid, and incredibly awkward to play.
That's where I ended this little adventure. Unfortunately Lock 'n' Chase left a perhaps unfairly bitter taste in my mouth. The Intellivision definitely has its strengths, but the idea that it's on-paper technical superiority wins out hands-down against the 2600 is pure bunk!













