When I want a GUI or hi-res graphics I use the PC. That's what it's good for. I really don't care about any of that on the 8-bit Atari. The built-in and programmable modes it already has are all want or expect from it.
For a lot of things I actually find a GUI to be too restrictive or slow. Then again, there are a lot of other things, like graphics or video editing work I also do, that are much easier in a GUI.
I like the Atari just fine the way it is, limitations and all for what little I still use it for. Mostly I use it for light programming and typing in software for the Atari Archives web site. And most of that I actually do on my PC with the emulator. I use my 800XLs mostly for testing on real hardware. Especially when I do ML programming. Every so often I'll find something that may not work quite the same on one or the other.
When I'm trying to learn some kind of low or medium level programming I actually prefer the simplicity of an 8-bit Atari or an older PC with MS-DOS. I find it a lot easier to deal with. And if I screw up and manage to crash the machine I just hit the reset button and I'm back to work in seconds (versus minutes with Windoze).
As to 80 columns, after I upgraded the video, that mode (without needing any special hardware other than a BIOS load) looks great on my 27" Sony Trinitron TV hooked up with an S-video cable.
But someday the CRT in that TV may die and I'll need to hook up my Atari 800XLs to a modern TV. None of which have S-video inputs.
If you're even a little like me, once you've gotten used to the sharpness and improved color you get from a good S-video output you notice just how washed out and blurry the composite output is.
And it really would be nice to be able to hook up my second 800XL to the big Sony in the living room and get a decent picture from it. Which I can't get with the RF or composite outputs.
I'm not what you'd call a big Atari fanatic. I have a lot of very fond memories of using and programming the 8-bit and early ST series Atari computers. Mostly the 8-bit models. Part of it for me is a nostalgia thing. I sometimes go for several months of not using the Atari computers, and then I'll go for several months of using them a lot.
I've never really been into gaming much on the Atari computers. Not that I didn't used to spend plenty of time playing arcade games on my 5200 or 800 computer. But I spent a lot more time programming or editing documents. Mostly I've used it for programming and learning and figuring out things. It's still a great platform for that and a lot of what I learn on the Atari easily translates to programming on both older and modern PCs.
Now that I'm retired I finally have the time to learn all the things I wanted to learn but couldn't back in the day. Every so often I'll break out a new programming book for the Atari or for MS-DOS and read the book cover to cover and do all the programming projects in it. I'll also mess around with stuff to test ideas I get from what I'm learning or to figure out how things work. =^.^=
But, as I'm retired on disability, I often don't have a lot of money available to spend on my hobbies. Keeping myself and my kitties fed, keeping a roof over our heads and the the car running definitely takes priority.
So spending $100 on a VBXE is just out of the question for me, and probably for a lot of other casual or part-time users like me. 90% of what it does is just overkill for us and we'd never use all the fancy modes it has.
Now, if someone made something that took the output of ANTIC/GTIA and converted it to a modern digital format like a VGA or DVI and priced it around $20-$30 I suspect a lot of folks would be interested in that. Even it if was as much as $50-$60 I would probably buy at least one.
BobKat =^.^=
bob1200xl, on Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:30 PM, said:
What if you got higher screen resolution to go with the improved video? As you say, not a lot of justification for big bucks just to see 320x192, or such. That looks OK with minimal tweaking, now. 80 columns and GUIs may need a little more bandwidth.
Bob
bobkat2769, on Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:50 PM, said:
Um, yeah... =^.^=;;
I just can't seem to justify spending as much as or more than I paid for two 800XLs and a 1050 drive (about $100) just to get component output.
Now, I could see myself buying something that cost about $10 to $20. At the most $30 to get component out on an 8-bit Atari.
Well, as long as my ancient 27" sony keeps working it's not really a problem. I've used it for an Atari display since the day I got it. =^.^=;;
BobKat
bob1200xl, on Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:55 PM, said:
Component (or VGA) output wouldn't be terribly difficult, but it wouldn't be cheap. You would have to start with a 4-layer PCB, for one...
Bob
bobkat2769, on Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:37 AM, said:
[clip!]
I'd been hoping that someone here would come up with a way to cheaply mod an 800XL to output component video, but I guess it's either too difficult or nobody wants to bother with it. Considering that S-video inputs seem to be going the way of the dodo I'd think that someone beside me would be interested in this.