moycon, on Thu Feb 9, 2012 6:36 PM, said:
ninjarabbit, on Thu Feb 9, 2012 5:55 PM, said:
where middle-tier developers will have to make a choice: go all in with the superblockbusters or develop cheap casual games and stick with the handhelds
Sounds nice!! I think these days gamers don't need 800 games available to them on any single console. I for one would have 200 games available for any given generation, all high quality, all solid in the gameplay department.
Eh. You're assuming that fewer titles = greater quality. They aren't related by any means. At best you'd just have less shovelware with the quality of anything else being unaffected. Since most people who are paying attention to the gaming scene are already avoiding shovelware, they won't notice a difference. Of course this means niche titles will vanish as well.
A crash like the one in the 80's, for the types of reasons of the 80's, is pretty easy to avoid. If the console industry crashes, it'll likely be because of the various things they're doing to suck 100 dollars per title out of everybody. And it won't mean the end of video games - people will just move to other platforms or start playing the things they've been sitting on for years.
One thing is for sure, video game companies need to learn how to budget properly.




Send me a message
Find content
Male
Display name history
